Ready to go on the left, but Adam really that good at left-back? |
Advertisement
When Adam is switched to the left it has been Diego Rico that has missed out. Still Rico has played in 21 games and has been involved in six of AFCB's seven wins. You might have considered him a good omen then, but Howe has not always picked Rico to start when he has been available. What I like about Rico is he gets forward and he has a staggering count of a 122 crosses from his 21 games and averages 40.81 passes per game. Rico has also made 62 interceptions compared to Smith's 19.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Coastal Garden Buildings
Previous post on Cherry Chimes - Why has Solanke found it so hard to score?
The obvious answer to your question is that playing Adam smith at left back allows Eddie to play Simon francis at right back.
ReplyDeleteWhilst Franno has been a good servant to the club, shuffling to team around to accommodate him is not good for team balance. Eddie has to consider the post Franno era.
Jack Stacey too played well on the right and perhaps Eddie wanted to keep him or Francis in the team at times. But the choice has often been to drop Rico to fit Smith in.
DeleteI dont really like wrong-footed full backs as they are vulnerable when turning their body to pass square infield. A perfect example was Adam Smith being caught out at Arsenal last season. It could be argued that they have an advantage in dealing with modern wrong footed wingers constantly looking to cut-in towards goal - eg Salah - but this doesn't seem to have that much effect in practice.
ReplyDeleteRico is a key player for AFCB and should only get better with confidence and also start getting on the scoresheet.
I think Smith got caught out this season at the Burnley away game as well, for the handball call just before Bournemouth went and scored, and had it ruled out for the hand ball. A left sided player might have judged the cross Smith had to defend better coming from the right to the left.
Delete