Too many goals, goals goals in Bournemouth's net. |
Advertisement
The midfield has been unable to weigh in with many goals. The central midfielders especially have been more defensive in outlook with Philip Billing and Jefferson Lerma being Howe's main choices in 2019-20. Lewis Cook and Dan Gosling have more attacking style, but didn't manage to push their claims enough for starts. With Ryan Fraser wanting out and Howe needing to rely on Harry Wilson to fill in for a star-man like David Brooks, we can also see weaknesses on the wings.
Advertisement
Up front too, Callum Wilson managed just eight goals this time and Josh King struggled with six, several of which were from the penalty spot. Dominic Solanke might have weighed in with three goals since the restart, but it was too few for a forward that was a big signing from Liverpool. Selling Lys Mousset and letting Defoe go on loan, left the Cherries short of fire power and it wasn't until January that Sam Surridge was recalled from his loan at Swansea.So, for me there were weaknesses all over the park. But it was the inconsistencies and individual errors that made Bournemouth sink even faster. Much of that can be put down to the injuries and players not having regular partners playing next to them.
We can also say the club wasn't good enough in losing games to other struggling teams. They lost the six pointers in 2020 to Brighton, West Ham, Norwich and Watford. There can't be too much doubt that Bournemouth were not playing to a standard that they are capable of and that is what hurts. It hurts more than knowing Aston Villa had a point more than they should have, with the point they got against Sheffield United, thanks to the failure of goal line technology.
Fans shouldn't be disappointed if many of the senior players move on now. Their needs to be new ambition and excitement about the squad. The players we have seen play for AFCB ultimately cam up short. Let's see a new era and more success. UTCIAD!
I think it is somewhat unfair to point at individuals - especially defenders and full backs who, in my opinion, all have plenty more to offer.
ReplyDeleteWithout wishing to tell management their job, I can't help wondering if this is a suitable juncture for a slight change in method : Fulham -under Scott Parker - have now moved to a more possession based game, varied with the alternative long ball to the strikers. This might also be a way forward also for the Cherries, and was possibly evident against Everton and Leicester (albeit against ten men). We certainly have the technical ability for this, and a season in the Championship could be a suitable environment to recalibrate.
It was interesting to see the long ball used quite a lot after the restart. This is something we have very rarely done in the previous 4 seasons. My thoughts were that we should mix it up. If we always try to play out from the back it makes it easier for the opposition. Mixing it up makes it a whole new ball game. I hope we carry on like this
ReplyDeleteTotally agree,playing out from the back felt almost like punishment at times for a team who are not let's face it a top 7 club. Mixing up like the previous comment gives an unpredictability to the opposition and takes the pressure off when against technically better sides. I hope Eddie has learnt from this. Playing a long ball to talented strikers and wingers is different from just hoofing it up and is not a technically inferior technique. Remember how effective it was for us in the championship, look how Leicester provide for Vardy. It's not a second best option as we proved in the retart games. I think we will have a good season and will get back to the prem. Eddie will learn a lot from this. Utciad
ReplyDelete